{"id":399,"date":"2014-09-26T09:52:33","date_gmt":"2014-09-26T13:52:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/?p=399"},"modified":"2014-09-26T09:52:33","modified_gmt":"2014-09-26T13:52:33","slug":"can-facebook-save-digital-publishing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/2014\/09\/26\/can-facebook-save-digital-publishing\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Facebook save digital publishing?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As I&#8217;ve said before many times, Apple and Amazon are not friends to subscription publishers. They either don&#8217;t understand the subscription publishing model, or, understanding it, they want to undermine it. <\/p>\n<p>The problem is that subscription publishing relies on a relationship between the publisher and the subscriber. It&#8217;s not a one and done thing like buying a book. <\/p>\n<p>Apple and Amazon insist that the subscriber is <i>their<\/i> customer, and that simply doesn&#8217;t work for the publisher. The problem is not the 30 percent remit! It&#8217;s the subscriber information. <\/p>\n<p>What subscription publishers need is a platform on which to post their digital content where they can retain the relationship with the subscriber. It&#8217;s really a simple thing, but apparently nobody wants to do it. <\/p>\n<p>Evernote would be a good model. Evernote has a great platform for viewing content online. All they would need to do is add a &#8220;my subscriptions&#8221; area, where the subscriber could add the login information for all his publications. Evernote would authenticate the subscriber with the publisher&#8217;s API, and the publisher would provide the content through a feed. <\/p>\n<p>Simple. Elegant. Perfect. <\/p>\n<p>But Evernote won&#8217;t do it because it would spoil their relationship with Darth Vader (aka Apple). <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a shame, because this Evernote concept solves a couple real problems. <\/p>\n<p>First, it gets publishers out of the software business &#8212; where they do not belong. Publishers are in the content business. They can&#8217;t be worrying about tweaking their technology every time somebody comes out with a new phone or tablet, or changes their OS. <\/p>\n<p>Second, the reader doesn&#8217;t have to download a different app for each of his publications. He simply has a place where he keeps all the stuff he wants to read. (In this example, Evernote.) And &#8230; there it is. Easy. <\/p>\n<p>Third, it helps Evernote because all the publishers would be promoting them, and their software would become the default reader software. <\/p>\n<p>Still &#8230; nobody&#8217;s doing it. Oh well. <\/p>\n<p>But today I read that <a href=\"http:\/\/digiday.com\/platforms\/facebook-handles-publisher-relations\/\">Facebook is courting publishers.<\/a> <\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no reason why Facebook couldn&#8217;t take on the role that I outline above for Evernote. Facebook could become the reader&#8217;s interface. <\/p>\n<p>This would be even better than my Evernote model because publishers could allow readers to share content (with certain limits, I&#8217;m sure) which would help the publisher extend his audience. It would help Facebook because they could charge some nominal fee for the service they&#8217;re providing to the publishers. <\/p>\n<p>Imagine logging into Facebook not only to see what cats are up to these days, but to find out what <i>Sports Illustrated<\/i> says about the Redskins, what <i>Brew Your Own<\/i> says about Belgian Strong Ales, and what Knight Kiplinger says about investing. <\/p>\n<p>People would never get their faces out of their phones. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As I&#8217;ve said before many times, Apple and Amazon are not friends to subscription publishers. They either don&#8217;t understand the subscription publishing model, or, understanding it, they want to undermine it. The problem is that subscription publishing relies on a relationship between the publisher and the subscriber. It&#8217;s not a one and done thing like &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/2014\/09\/26\/can-facebook-save-digital-publishing\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading &lsquo;Can Facebook save digital publishing?&rsquo; &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=399"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":400,"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/399\/revisions\/400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregkrehbiel.com\/marketing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}